Nga Ulsi Manja<\/p>\n
Raporti i Komitetit p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut t\u00eb Dhom\u00ebs s\u00eb Avokat\u00ebve t\u00eb Anglis\u00eb dhe Uellsit ngre pik\u00ebpyetje serioze mbi pavar\u00ebsin\u00eb, paanshm\u00ebrin\u00eb dhe standardet e procesit ndaj ish-udh\u00ebheq\u00ebsve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb.Ka raste kur nj\u00eb raport nuk ndryshon gjith\u00e7ka. Thjesht konfirmon at\u00eb q\u00eb shum\u00ebkush e ka kuptuar prej koh\u00ebsh.<\/p>\n
I till\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb raporti i publikuar m\u00eb 30 prill 2026 nga Komiteti p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut i Dhom\u00ebs s\u00eb Avokat\u00ebve t\u00eb Anglis\u00eb dhe Uellsit (BHRC), pas k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs p\u00ebr nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim t\u00eb pavarur mbi funksionimin e Dhomave t\u00eb Specializuara t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs.Ky nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb dokument i hartuar nga mb\u00ebshtet\u00ebsit e Hashim Tha\u00e7it. Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb as nj\u00eb memorandum politik i qeveris\u00eb s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs, as nj\u00eb manifest patriotik i veteran\u00ebve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb. \u00cbsht\u00eb produkt i nj\u00eb organizmi prestigjioz juridik britanik, i cili u thirr pik\u00ebrisht p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00ebse kjo gjykat\u00eb po i respekton standardet q\u00eb pretendon se mish\u00ebron.Dhe p\u00ebrgjigjja q\u00eb del nga raporti \u00ebsht\u00eb shkat\u00ebrruese.Jo sepse autor\u00ebt deklarojn\u00eb se Dhomat e Specializuara jan\u00eb t\u00eb paligjshme. Nuk e b\u00ebjn\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb. P\u00ebrkundrazi. Ata pranojn\u00eb se n\u00eb let\u00ebr arkitektura juridike duket solide. Por problemi i madh me institucionet moderne nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb shkruhet n\u00eb statutet e tyre. Problemi \u00ebsht\u00eb si funksionojn\u00eb n\u00eb realitet.N\u00eb realitet, raporti p\u00ebrshkruan nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb q\u00eb vuan nga dyshime serioze mbi pavar\u00ebsin\u00eb e saj, nga nj\u00eb regjim paraburgimi q\u00eb rrezikon t\u00eb shnd\u00ebrrohet n\u00eb d\u00ebnim pa vendim gjykate, nga procedura t\u00eb paqarta n\u00eb administrimin e provave dhe nga nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie problematike mes drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe diplomacis\u00eb nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare.Me pak fjal\u00eb, raporti p\u00ebrshkruan pik\u00ebrisht at\u00eb q\u00eb Dhomat e Specializuara u krijuan p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos qen\u00eb.Q\u00eb n\u00eb fillim, kjo gjykat\u00eb mbante brenda vetes nj\u00eb kontradikt\u00eb t\u00eb pazgjidhshme. Ajo u paraqit si pjes\u00eb e sistemit t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs, por u largua nga Kosova. U paraqit si instrument i sovranitetit juridik t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs, por iu besua ekskluzivisht gjyqtar\u00ebve t\u00eb huaj. U paraqit si gjykat\u00eb e paanshme, por praktikisht e p\u00ebrqendroi misionin e saj tek nj\u00ebra pal\u00eb e konfliktit.P\u00ebr vite me radh\u00eb, mb\u00ebshtet\u00ebsit e saj na than\u00eb se pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebto karakteristika p\u00ebrb\u00ebnin garancin\u00eb e pavar\u00ebsis\u00eb. Sot, raporti i BHRC-s\u00eb ngre pyetjen e kund\u00ebrt: po sikur k\u00ebto t\u00eb jen\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht burimi i problemit?Nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb q\u00eb nuk i beson asnj\u00eb gjyqtari t\u00eb vendit q\u00eb pretendon t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbej\u00eb. Nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb q\u00eb operon mij\u00ebra kilometra larg shoq\u00ebris\u00eb q\u00eb prek. Nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb ku em\u00ebrimet dhe financimet kalojn\u00eb n\u00ebp\u00ebr filtra politik\u00eb nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar\u00eb. Kjo mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb shum\u00eb gj\u00ebra, por \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb paraqitet si modeli ideal i drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb paanshme.Edhe m\u00eb shqet\u00ebsuese jan\u00eb gjetjet mbi provat.Raporti evidenton diskrecion t\u00eb gjer\u00eb n\u00eb pranimin e tyre, p\u00ebrdorim t\u00eb theksuar t\u00eb materialeve me shkrim, vonesa n\u00eb zbulimin e dokumenteve p\u00ebr mbrojtjen dhe shqet\u00ebsime serioze lidhur me materialet e ardhura nga autoritetet serbe.Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb detaj q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb kalohet me nj\u00eb ngritje supesh.N\u00eb \u00e7do konflikt, burimi i prov\u00ebs ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi. Sidomos kur b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb luft\u00eb ku nj\u00ebra pal\u00eb ishte agresori dhe tjetra po luftonte p\u00ebr mbijetes\u00ebn e saj. Nj\u00eb drejt\u00ebsi serioze nuk mund t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb q\u00eb publiku t\u00eb mbyll\u00eb syt\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb k\u00ebsaj rrethane dhe t\u00eb supozoj\u00eb automatikisht se \u00e7do dokument q\u00eb mb\u00ebrrin nga aparatet shtet\u00ebrore serbe \u00ebsht\u00eb i past\u00ebr nga \u00e7do dyshim.Po aq problematik \u00ebsht\u00eb fakti q\u00eb nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e madhe e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb prova dokumentare dhe deklarime t\u00eb mbledhura larg syrit t\u00eb publikut, nd\u00ebrsa mbrojtja vazhdimisht \u00ebsht\u00eb ankuar p\u00ebr kufizime n\u00eb qasje, koh\u00eb dhe mjete.N\u00eb fund t\u00eb fundit, drejt\u00ebsia penale nuk ekziston p\u00ebr t\u00eb prodhuar narrativa historike. Ajo ekziston p\u00ebr t\u00eb provuar faj\u00ebsin\u00eb p\u00ebrtej \u00e7do dyshimi t\u00eb arsyesh\u00ebm.Dhe pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebtu q\u00ebndron problemi themelor i Dhomave t\u00eb Specializuara.Edhe n\u00ebse nes\u00ebr ato shpallin \u00e7far\u00ebdo vendimi p\u00ebr Hashim Tha\u00e7in, Kadri Veselin, Jakup Krasniqin dhe Rexhep Selimin, pyetja nuk do t\u00eb jet\u00eb thjesht n\u00ebse vendimi \u00ebsht\u00eb ligj\u00ebrisht i vlefsh\u00ebm. Pyetja do t\u00eb jet\u00eb n\u00ebse ai vendim \u00ebsht\u00eb produkt i nj\u00eb procesi q\u00eb ka fituar besimin e publikut dhe ka larguar dyshimet mbi paanshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e vet.Raporti i BHRC-s\u00eb sugjeron se p\u00ebrgjigjja ndaj k\u00ebsaj pyetjeje \u00ebsht\u00eb larg t\u00eb qenit pozitive.Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb arsyeja pse Dhomat e Specializuara ndodhen sot p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb prove m\u00eb t\u00eb madhe sesa vet\u00eb gjykimi i ish-komandant\u00ebve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb: prova e legjitimitetit t\u00eb tyre.N\u00ebse standardi i prov\u00ebs nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb absolutisht bind\u00ebs, n\u00ebse dyshimet mbi burimin dhe administrimin e provave mbeten, n\u00ebse paraburgimi shum\u00ebvje\u00e7ar vazhdon t\u00eb shihet si nj\u00eb nd\u00ebshkim paraprak dhe jo si nj\u00eb mas\u00eb procedurale, at\u00ebher\u00eb \u00e7do vendim d\u00ebnues do t\u00eb mbetet i ndjekur nga hija e dyshimit.Sepse drejt\u00ebsia nuk matet nga numri i viteve t\u00eb burgut q\u00eb shpall. Ajo matet nga besimi q\u00eb ngjall.Dhe kur nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb e nd\u00ebrtuar si kompromis politik si\u00e7 jan\u00eb Dhomat e Specializuara fillon t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb m\u00eb shum\u00eb pik\u00ebpyetje sesa p\u00ebrgjigje, at\u00ebher\u00eb problemi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb tek t\u00eb akuzuarit. Problemi \u00ebsht\u00eb tek vet\u00eb gjykata.Sepse nj\u00eb gjykat\u00eb q\u00eb l\u00eb pas m\u00eb shum\u00eb dyshime sesa bindje mund t\u00eb jap\u00eb vendime, por v\u00ebshtir\u00eb se mund t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb drejt\u00ebsi. Nj\u00eb vendim gjykate mund t\u00eb mbyll\u00eb nj\u00eb dosje. Vet\u00ebm drejt\u00ebsia e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb mund t\u00eb mbyll\u00eb nj\u00eb kapitull t\u00eb lavdish\u00ebm t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb dhe t\u00eb komandant\u00ebve t\u00eb saj.
\nAutori \u00ebsht\u00eb deputet dhe ish-Minist\u00ebr i Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb Qeverin\u00eb e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nga Ulsi Manja Raporti i Komitetit p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut t\u00eb Dhom\u00ebs s\u00eb Avokat\u00ebve…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":27092,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lajme"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27084","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27084"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27084\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27093,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27084\/revisions\/27093"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/27092"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}