Trupi Gjykues i Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale n\u00eb Hag\u00eb ka vendosur ta shtyj\u00eb edhe nj\u00eb her\u00eb shpalljen e aktgjykimit n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen gjyq\u00ebsore ndaj kat\u00ebr ish-krer\u00ebve t\u00eb Ushtris\u00eb \u00c7lirimtare t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs, duke e caktuar p\u00ebrfundimisht 16 shtatorin si dat\u00ebn p\u00ebr ta kumtuar vendimin.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb vendimin e publikuar t\u00eb m\u00ebrkur\u00ebn, Trupi Gjykues thekson se nj\u00eb zgjatje e m\u00ebtejshme e afatit \u00ebsht\u00eb \u201cabsolutisht e nevojshme\u201d p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb v\u00ebllimit t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonsh\u00ebm t\u00eb provave dhe kompleksitetit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes.<\/p>\n
Sipas arsyetimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs, gjat\u00eb procesit jan\u00eb administruar d\u00ebshmit\u00eb e rreth 270 d\u00ebshmitar\u00ebve, jan\u00eb pranuar n\u00eb prova 5.467 materiale provuese, nd\u00ebrsa transkripti i procedur\u00ebs arrin n\u00eb 29.238 faqe. Po ashtu, gjykata vler\u00ebson se \u00e7\u00ebshtja mbulon ngjarje q\u00eb shtrihen n\u00eb m\u00eb shum\u00eb se nj\u00eb vit e gjysm\u00eb, p\u00ebrfshin nj\u00eb num\u00ebr t\u00eb madh vendesh ku pretendohet se jan\u00eb kryer krime dhe shum\u00eb incidente individuale.<\/p>\n
Trupi Gjykues thekson se, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 kompleksitetit t\u00eb provave, procedura ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me akuza ndaj kat\u00ebr t\u00eb akuzuarve, p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsia e secilit prej tyre \u201cduhet t\u00eb shqyrtohet individualisht dhe me kujdes\u201d.<\/p>\n
\u201cTrupi Gjykues konsideron se nj\u00eb zgjatje e m\u00ebtejshme \u00ebsht\u00eb domosdoshm\u00ebrisht e nevojshme n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb Rregull\u00ebs 159(1). Trupi Gjykues rikujton se, si\u00e7 \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb Urdhrin p\u00ebr Zgjatjen e Afatit p\u00ebr Shpalljen e Aktgjykimit t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb: (i) ka pranuar provat e rreth 270 d\u00ebshmitar\u00ebve (gojarisht dhe me shkrim); (ii) ka pranuar n\u00eb prova 5.467 materiale provuese; (iii) transkripti i k\u00ebtyre procedurave ka 29.238 faqe; dhe (iv) nd\u00ebrlikueshm\u00ebria e procedur\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht fakti q\u00eb ngjarjet e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes mbulojn\u00eb m\u00eb shum\u00eb se nj\u00eb vit e gjysm\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrfshijn\u00eb nj\u00eb num\u00ebr t\u00eb madh vendesh ku pretendohet se jan\u00eb kryer krime, si dhe nj\u00eb num\u00ebr t\u00eb konsideruesh\u00ebm incidentesh individuale. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, procedurat kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me akuza ndaj kat\u00ebr t\u00eb akuzuarve, p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsia e t\u00eb cil\u00ebve duhet t\u00eb shqyrtohet individualisht dhe me kujdes. Duke pasur parasysh sa m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar q\u00eb ai t\u00eb mund t\u00eb kryej\u00eb nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim t\u00eb plot\u00eb dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb provave dhe t\u00eb jap\u00eb nj\u00eb opinion t\u00eb arsyetuar q\u00eb merr parasysh v\u00ebllimin e konsideruesh\u00ebm t\u00eb provave dhe nd\u00ebrlikueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e procedur\u00ebs, Trupi Gjykues \u00ebsht\u00eb i bindur se nj\u00eb zgjatje e m\u00ebtejshme \u00ebsht\u00eb domosdoshm\u00ebrisht e nevojshme\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n
Gjykata thot\u00eb n\u00eb vendim se t\u00eb akuzuarit kan\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb gjykohen brenda nj\u00eb afati t\u00eb arsyesh\u00ebm dhe se \u00ebsht\u00eb e vet\u00ebdijshme p\u00ebr koh\u00ebn q\u00eb ata kan\u00eb kaluar n\u00eb paraburgim. Megjithat\u00eb, sipas vendimit, nj\u00eb shtyrje shtes\u00eb prej pak m\u00eb pak se 60 dit\u00ebsh nuk do t\u2019u shkaktoj\u00eb atyre paragjykim t\u00eb panevojsh\u00ebm, nd\u00ebrsa \u00ebsht\u00eb e domosdoshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim t\u00eb plot\u00eb, t\u00eb drejt\u00eb dhe t\u00eb arsyetuar t\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha provave.<\/p>\n
\u201cTrupi Gjykues pranon se, n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me nenin 21(4)(d), t\u00eb akuzuarit kan\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb gjykohen brenda nj\u00eb afati t\u00eb arsyesh\u00ebm. Trupi Gjykues \u00ebsht\u00eb i vet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr koh\u00ebn q\u00eb t\u00eb akuzuarit kan\u00eb kaluar tashm\u00eb n\u00eb paraburgim dhe p\u00ebr nevoj\u00ebn q\u00eb procedurat t\u00eb zhvillohen sa m\u00eb shpejt q\u00eb t\u00eb jet\u00eb e mundur. Megjithat\u00eb, duke pasur parasysh rrethanat e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes, Trupi Gjykues \u00ebsht\u00eb i bindur se nj\u00eb zgjatje shtes\u00eb p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb pak m\u00eb t\u00eb shkurt\u00ebr se 60 dit\u00eb nuk do t\u2019u shkaktoj\u00eb paragjykim t\u00eb panevojsh\u00ebm t\u00eb akuzuarve. Zgjatja arsyetohet nga nevoja p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb, gjith\u00ebp\u00ebrfshir\u00ebs dhe t\u00eb arsyetuar t\u00eb dosjes s\u00eb provave, si dhe nga k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr nj\u00eb opinion t\u00eb arsyetuar me shkrim q\u00eb pasqyron me sakt\u00ebsi at\u00eb dosje. Trupi Gjykues \u00ebsht\u00eb i bindur se asnj\u00eb zgjatje m\u00eb e shkurt\u00ebr nuk do t\u2019i mund\u00ebsonte atij t\u2019i p\u00ebrmbushte n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb duhur p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsit\u00eb e tij\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n
Trupi Gjykues tha se aktgjykimi i Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb do t\u00eb shpallet \u201cpublikisht n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb popullit t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs dhe n\u00eb prani t\u00eb t\u00eb akuzuarve, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 rasteve kur rrethana t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme e arsyetojn\u00eb munges\u00ebn e tyre\u201d.<\/p>\n
\u201cTrupi Gjykues konsideron se caktimi i nj\u00eb date, n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb faz\u00eb, p\u00ebr shpalljen e Aktgjykimit t\u00eb Shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb Par\u00eb u siguron njoftim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb dhe n\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb personave t\u00eb interesuar\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendimin q\u00eb mban n\u00ebnshkrimin e kryetarit t\u00eb Trupit Gjykues, Charles Smith.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Trupi Gjykues i Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale n\u00eb Hag\u00eb ka vendosur ta shtyj\u00eb edhe nj\u00eb her\u00eb shpalljen…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":31662,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31654","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lajme"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31654","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31654"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31654\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31663,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31654\/revisions\/31663"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/31662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31654"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31654"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31654"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}