Nihil de nobis, sine nobis.
\nAsgj\u00eb p\u00ebr ne, pa ne.
\nKy parim latin \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shembull q\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson nj\u00eb standard t\u00eb demokracis\u00eb dhe t\u00eb shtetit t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs, q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb: vendimet q\u00eb prekin drejtp\u00ebrdrejt nj\u00eb kategori qytetar\u00ebsh nuk duhet t\u00eb merren pa pjes\u00ebmarrjen e tyre.
\nK\u00ebt\u00eb mund ta quajm\u00eb nj\u00eb nd\u00ebr arsyet pse zgjidhja e propozuar p\u00ebr provimin e jurisprudenc\u00ebs nuk mund t\u00eb shihet vet\u00ebm si nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje administrative q\u00eb mund t\u00eb g\u00eblltitet si kompromis. Ajo prek thell\u00ebsisht legjitimitetin e m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs se si nd\u00ebrtohen dhe merren vendimet publike.
\nPas muajsh peticione, reagime publike, diskutime politike, opinione t\u00eb ekspert\u00ebve, takime mediatike e institucionale, dy protestave masive para Ministris\u00eb s\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb, si dhe protestave mb\u00ebshtet\u00ebse n\u00eb Tiran\u00eb dhe Prishtin\u00eb, u prezantua nj\u00eb zgjidhje.
\nPor pyetja mbetet e nj\u00ebjt\u00eb:
\nA \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo zgjidhje ajo q\u00eb k\u00ebrkuam ne si L\u00ebvizje Studentore?
\nNe si L\u00ebvizje Studentore nuk k\u00ebrkuam kompromis. Nuk k\u00ebrkuam asnj\u00eb privilegj. Nuk k\u00ebrkuam trajtim t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb. K\u00ebrkuam vet\u00ebm zbatimin e ligjit. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb arsyeja pse edhe sot, p\u00ebrpara se ta konsiderojm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb zgjidhje si fitore apo si kompromis, duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb b\u00ebnte \u00e7do jurist: ta krahasojm\u00eb me standardin juridik n\u00eb fuqi.
\nLigji p\u00ebr P\u00ebrdorimin e Gjuh\u00ebve nuk l\u00eb shum\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00eb p\u00ebr dilema. N\u00eb nenin 23, paragrafi (5), ai p\u00ebrcakton:
\n\u201cN\u00eb rast t\u00eb mos-harmonizimit t\u00eb dispozitave t\u00eb k\u00ebtij ligji me dispozitat gjuh\u00ebsore t\u00eb ligjit tjet\u00ebr, organet kan\u00eb p\u00ebr detyr\u00eb t\u2019i zbatojn\u00eb dispozitat e k\u00ebtij ligji.\u201d
\nKy formulim ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb. Ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsi nuk ka parapar\u00eb q\u00eb organet t\u00eb zgjedhin se cilin ligj preferojn\u00eb t\u00eb zbatojn\u00eb. P\u00ebrkundrazi, ai ka p\u00ebrcaktuar qart\u00eb se, n\u00eb rast p\u00ebrplasjeje ose mosp\u00ebrputhjeje, p\u00ebrpar\u00ebsi kan\u00eb dispozitat e Ligjit p\u00ebr P\u00ebrdorimin e Gjuh\u00ebve.
\nPik\u00ebrisht p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, ne si L\u00ebvizje Studentore nuk mund ta konsiderojm\u00eb t\u00eb mbyllur k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje vet\u00ebm pse pjesa teorike do t\u00eb zhvillohet n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn shqipe. Problemi juridik nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb hap p\u00ebrpara. Problemi juridik \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb arritur standardi q\u00eb vet\u00eb ligji e k\u00ebrkon.
\nN\u00eb diskursin publik \u00ebsht\u00eb krijuar p\u00ebrshtypja sikur student\u00ebt shqiptar\u00eb po k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb di\u00e7ka t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme. Ndoshta sepse protestat kan\u00eb qen\u00eb t\u00eb tilla? N\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, k\u00ebrkesa jon\u00eb ka qen\u00eb krejt\u00ebsisht e kund\u00ebrta. Nuk kemi k\u00ebrkuar krijimin e nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte t\u00eb re, por zbatimin e nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejte ekzistuese.
\nSipas zgjidhjes s\u00eb propozuar, pjesa teorike e provimit do t\u00eb zhvillohet n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn shqipe, nd\u00ebrsa pjesa praktike n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn maqedonase.
\nKjo ngre nj\u00eb pyetje t\u00eb thjesht\u00eb juridike:
\nN\u00ebse gjuha shqipe mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret n\u00eb nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs, mbi \u00e7far\u00eb baze juridike nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret edhe n\u00eb pjes\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr?
\nKjo \u00ebsht\u00eb arsyeja pse ne si L\u00ebvizje Studentore nuk e konsiderojm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb debat t\u00eb p\u00ebrfunduar. Jo sepse refuzojm\u00eb dialogun, por sepse besojm\u00eb se dialogu nuk mund ta z\u00ebvend\u00ebsoj\u00eb ligjin.
\nInstitucionet na d\u00ebshmuan se mund t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb kompromis. Tani mbetet t\u00eb d\u00ebshmojn\u00eb se mund ta zbatojn\u00eb ligjin n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb plot\u00eb. E drejta nuk ndahet me gjysm\u00ebmasa. Ajo ose zbatohet, ose nuk zbatohet. Nuk mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb e plot\u00eb n\u00eb faz\u00ebn teorike dhe e kufizuar n\u00eb faz\u00ebn praktike pa nj\u00eb arsyetim t\u00eb qart\u00eb juridik. P\u00ebrndryshe, nuk kemi m\u00eb standard juridik, por nj\u00eb zgjidhje administrative t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar mbi kompromise politike.
\nSepse kur vendimet merren p\u00ebr student\u00ebt pa student\u00ebt, kur t\u00eb drejtat realizohen vet\u00ebm pjes\u00ebrisht dhe kur barazia fillon t\u00eb matet me p\u00ebrqindje, at\u00ebher\u00eb nuk jemi m\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb problemi teknik. Jemi p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb problemi t\u00eb koherenc\u00ebs juridike.
\nKjo ishte zgjidhja e propozuar. Ne nuk e pranuam, madje e kishim b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb qart\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrpara se t\u00eb prezantohej se nj\u00eb zgjidhje q\u00eb nuk garanton zbatimin e plot\u00eb t\u00eb ligjit nuk mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb e pranueshme. K\u00ebrkesat tona kan\u00eb qen\u00eb t\u00eb qarta, t\u00eb argumentuara dhe t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetura n\u00eb ligj.
\nP\u00ebr t\u00eb drejtat q\u00eb ligji tashm\u00eb i garanton, nuk negociohet. P\u00ebr gjuh\u00ebn q\u00eb flasim, nuk b\u00ebjm\u00eb kompromis.
\nPrandaj, parimi “Nihil de nobis, sine nobis” mbetet po aq aktual sot sa ka qen\u00eb n\u00eb momentin kur u formulua p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb.
\nAsgj\u00eb p\u00ebr ne, pa ne.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nihil de nobis, sine nobis. Asgj\u00eb p\u00ebr ne, pa ne. Ky parim latin \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":32135,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lajme","category-maqedoni"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32130"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32130\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32159,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32130\/revisions\/32159"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/32135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}