{"id":9022,"date":"2026-05-01T20:47:32","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T20:47:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/?p=9022"},"modified":"2026-05-01T20:47:32","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T20:47:32","slug":"gjyqtaret-si-prokurore-krejt-cka-thuhet-ne-raportin-e-eksperteve-britanike-per-gjykaten-speciale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/?p=9022","title":{"rendered":"Gjyqtar\u00ebt si prokuror\u00eb | Krejt \u00e7ka thuhet n\u00eb raportin e ekspert\u00ebve britanik\u00eb p\u00ebr Gjykat\u00ebn Speciale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Komiteti i Od\u00ebs s\u00eb Avokat\u00ebve p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut i Anglis\u00eb dhe Uellsit, nj\u00eb organizat\u00eb e pavarur, kredibile dhe me fokus n\u00eb t\u00eb drejtat e njeriut, ka hartuar nj\u00eb raport rreth 100 faqe p\u00ebr proceset gjyq\u00ebsore n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale n\u00eb Hag\u00eb.<br \/>\nKjo \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit n\u00eb Kosov\u00eb, dhe numri i shkeljeve e dilemave q\u00eb jan\u00eb evidentuar, \u00ebsht\u00eb i madh.<br \/>\nFillimisht organizata e njohur ka sqaruar juridiksionin e Dhomave t\u00eb Specializuara, duke konstatuar se kan\u00eb p\u00ebsuar ndryshime n\u00eb mandat. Nga akuzat p\u00ebr trafikim t\u00eb organeve, deri te akuzar p\u00ebr krime t\u00eb luft\u00ebs e krime kund\u00ebr njer\u00ebzimit ndaj kat\u00ebr ish-krer\u00ebve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDuke qen\u00eb se theksi i Raportit t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Evrop\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb te \u201ckrimi i organizuar\u201d dhe tregtia e paligjshme me organe \u2013 \u00e7\u00ebshtje q\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb ndjekur penalisht nga DhSK-ja \u2013 b\u00ebhet e qart\u00eb se mandati i DhSK-s\u00eb ka p\u00ebsuar ndryshim.Juridiksioni personal dhe territorial i DhSK-s\u00eb mund\u00ebson ndjekjen penale edhe t\u00eb individ\u00ebve t\u00eb tjer\u00eb p\u00ebrve\u00e7 an\u00ebtar\u00ebve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb. Megjithat\u00eb, fokusi m\u00eb i ngusht\u00eb ndaj U\u00c7K-s\u00eb buron nga Raporti i K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Evrop\u00ebs, marr\u00ebveshja me BE-n\u00eb lidhur me mandatin e EULEX-it39 dhe realiteti m\u00eb I gjer\u00eb politik n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin \u00ebsht\u00eb themeluar DhSK-ja. Kjo mbetet nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje me shum\u00eb polemika\u201d, thuhet qysh n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb raportit.<\/p>\n<p>Paraburgimi dhe qindra k\u00ebrkesa t\u00eb refuzuara<\/p>\n<p>Nj\u00eb nga shkeljet m\u00eb serioze q\u00eb ka evidentuar ky raport i hartuar nga ekspert\u00ebt britanik\u00eb, \u00ebsht\u00eb ai i paraburgimit, dhe faktit q\u00eb Tha\u00e7i, Veseli, Krasniqi e Selimi, nuk pat\u00ebn asnj\u00eb mun\u00ebdsi lirimi. Raporti evidenton mbi 100 k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr lirim, dhe asnj\u00eb aprovim.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas k\u00ebsaj organizate, kjo nxit dilema p\u00ebr shkelje serioze t\u00eb parimit baz\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb njeriut, liris\u00eb s\u00eb l\u00ebvizjes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMegjithat\u00eb, pengesa strukturore p\u00ebr lirimin e p\u00ebrkohsh\u00ebm e krijuar nga Marr\u00ebveshja me Shtetin Prit\u00ebs, dhe e p\u00ebrforcuar nga v\u00ebshtir\u00ebsit\u00eb p\u00ebr lirimin n\u00eb Kosov\u00eb, ka pasoja t\u00eb thella p\u00ebr personat e akuzuar. Ligjshm\u00ebria e paraburgimit q\u00eb rrjedh prej k\u00ebsaj nuk mund t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet in abstracto, por nj\u00eb paraburgim i till\u00eb me hap\u00ebsir\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb kufizuar p\u00ebr lirim t\u00eb p\u00ebrkohsh\u00ebm ngre shqet\u00ebsime lidhur me p\u00ebrputhjen me nenin 5 t\u00eb KEDNj-s\u00eb dhe nenin 9 t\u00eb KNDCP-s\u00eb\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb raport.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb mesin e shkeljeve theksohen edhe p\u00ebrgjimi i vizitave, kufizimi i takimeve me familjar\u00eb, lidhjet me video-call, dhe refuzimi p\u00ebr ta ardhur n\u00eb ceremonit\u00eb mortore t\u00eb familjar\u00ebve.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGjyqtar\u00ebt si prokuror\u00eb\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Kritika t\u00eb m\u00ebdha kan\u00eb dal\u00eb nga raporti lidhur me gjyqtar\u00ebt. Qysh n\u00eb fillim, thuhet se krejt gjyqtar\u00ebt jan\u00eb nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar\u00eb, dhe kjo ka ndikuar q\u00eb ata t\u00eb mos ken\u00eb njohuri t\u00eb thella p\u00ebr realitetin n\u00eb Kosov\u00eb, dhe realitetin e luft\u00ebs. Gjithashtu, fakti se gjyqtar\u00ebt jan\u00eb nga shtetet q\u00eb e financojn\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Speciale, p\u00ebrb\u00ebn dilema t\u00eb thella p\u00ebr konflikt t\u00eb interesit.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNatyra nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare e em\u00ebrimeve gjyq\u00ebsore n\u00eb DhSK ka si pasoj\u00eb t\u00eb pashmangshme faktin q\u00eb asnj\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs q\u00eb sh\u00ebrben n\u00eb DhSK nuk ka p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb paraprake n\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn dhe procedur\u00ebn penale t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs. Ky realitet paraqet problem p\u00ebr dy arsye. S\u00eb pari, DhSK- ja ka juridiksion t\u00eb kufizuar l\u00ebndor p\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs penale vendore t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb raport.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cP\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, kur p\u00ebrb\u00ebrja e trupit gjykues pasqyron shtetet kryesore financuese dhe propozuese t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs, dob\u00ebsohet perceptimi i pavar\u00ebsis\u00eb institucionale nga k\u00ebto shtete, dhe kjo dob\u00ebsi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb pa pasoja p\u00ebr legjitimitetin m\u00eb t\u00eb gjer\u00eb t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs. Mbivendosja nd\u00ebrmjet financuesve dhe propozuesve krijon gjithashtu nj\u00eb paraleliz\u00ebm t\u00eb pak\u00ebndsh\u00ebm: se nj\u00eb vend n\u00eb tryez\u00ebn e drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb u rezervohet atyre q\u00eb kan\u00eb mund\u00ebsi ta mb\u00ebshtesin financiarisht\u201d, thuhet m\u00eb tutje.<\/p>\n<p>Ekspert\u00ebt britanik\u00eb kan\u00eb adresuar kritika edhe p\u00ebr faktin se \u00ebsht\u00eb kryetarja e Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale ajo q\u00eb em\u00ebron, cakton e anulon trupet gjykuese. Madje, edhe kur k\u00ebrkohet p\u00ebrjashtimi i saj, ajo vendos p\u00ebr veten.<\/p>\n<p>Raporti flet p\u00ebr takime t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve me prokuror\u00eb, t\u00eb kryetares s\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale me kryeprokurorin Jack Smith, t\u00eb cilat sipas raportit,<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRregulla 12 parasheh k\u00ebshillime nd\u00ebrmjet Kryetarit dhe Administratorit, si dhe, kur \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme, nd\u00ebrmjet Kryetarit dhe Prokurorit t\u00eb Specializuar, p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje q\u00eb lidhen me administrimin e veprimtaris\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore. Megjith\u00ebse e formuluar n\u00eb terma administrativ\u00eb, kjo dispozit\u00eb ngre \u00e7\u00ebshtje lidhur me p\u00ebrcaktimin e kufirit nd\u00ebrmjet koordinimit administrativ dhe pavar\u00ebsis\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht n\u00eb mas\u00ebn q\u00eb lejon nd\u00ebrveprim t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb nd\u00ebrmjet akter\u00ebve gjyq\u00ebsor\u00eb dhe prokurorial\u00eb jasht\u00eb pranis\u00eb s\u00eb mbrojtjes\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb raport.<\/p>\n<p>Madje, gjyqtar\u00ebt thuhet se kan\u00eb pasur fuqi sikur prokuror\u00eb t\u00eb dyt\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKorniza e Dhomave t\u00eb Specializuara i jep Trupit Gjykues nj\u00eb liri t\u00eb konsiderueshme si p\u00ebrcaktues i fakteve dhe ligjit. Pa kufizime t\u00eb qarta, kjo mund t\u00eb krijoj\u00eb kushte q\u00eb Trupi t\u00eb funksionoj\u00eb si nj\u00eb \u2018prokuror i dyt\u00eb\u2019, duke ndikuar n\u00eb barazin\u00eb e arm\u00ebve. Mbrojtja p\u00ebrballet jo vet\u00ebm me \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e Prokuroris\u00eb, por edhe me at\u00eb t\u00eb Trupit Gjykues, me pasoja t\u00eb qarta p\u00ebr burimet dhe strategjin\u00eb\u201d, thuhet m\u00eb tutje.<\/p>\n<p>Gjytqtar\u00ebve iu p\u00ebrmend\u00ebn edhe or\u00ebt e shumta p\u00ebr pyetje, n\u00eb shum\u00eb raste, edhe m\u00eb shum\u00eb se avokat\u00ebt.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDimensioni sasior i marrjes n\u00eb pyetje nga trupi gjykues ofron kontekst t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm. Deri m\u00eb 11 n\u00ebntor 2024, pas af\u00ebrsisht n\u00ebnt\u00ebmb\u00ebdhjet\u00eb muajsh d\u00ebshmi d\u00ebshmitar\u00ebsh, Paneli kishte shpenzuar 71 or\u00eb n\u00eb marrje n\u00eb pyetje t\u00eb d\u00ebshmitar\u00ebve, duke tejkaluar koh\u00ebn individuale t\u00eb marrjes n\u00eb pyetje t\u00eb tre prej kat\u00ebr ekipeve t\u00eb mbrojtjes t\u00eb marra ve\u00e7mas. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, mbrojtja n\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00ebsi kishte shpenzuar edhe 31 or\u00eb e 23 minuta n\u00eb kund\u00ebr- pyetje p\u00ebr t\u00eb trajtuar \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb ngritura nga pyetjet e Panelit, krahasuar me vet\u00ebm dymb\u00ebdhjet\u00eb minuta t\u00eb shpenzuara nga prokuroria n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje t\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs detyr\u00eb\u201d, thuhet m\u00eb tutje n\u00eb raport.<\/p>\n<p>Barazia e arm\u00ebve<\/p>\n<p>Sipas raportit, fakti q\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebt kan\u00eb pasur kaq shum\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyr\u00eb, ka ndikuar direkt n\u00eb barazin\u00eb e arm\u00ebve.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSi\u00e7 u p\u00ebrmend m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, korniza e DHSK-s\u00eb i jep Panelit nj\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00eb t\u00eb konsiderueshme veprimi si n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin e fakteve ashtu edhe t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs. N\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb kufizimeve n\u00eb shtrirjen dhe drejtimin e tij, k\u00ebto kompetenca krijojn\u00eb kushte q\u00eb Paneli t\u00eb funksionoj\u00eb, n\u00eb praktik\u00eb, si prokuror i dyt\u00eb, duke ndikuar n\u00eb barazin\u00eb e arm\u00ebve. At\u00ebher\u00eb mbrojtja detyrohet t\u2019i p\u00ebrgjigjet jo vet\u00ebm tez\u00ebs s\u00eb prokuroris\u00eb, por edhe, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb efektive, tez\u00ebs s\u00eb Panelit, me t\u00eb gjitha implikimet shtes\u00eb n\u00eb burime q\u00eb kjo sjell. Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb problem I parashikuesh\u00ebm i integrimit t\u00eb kompetencave t\u00eb gjera inkuizitore n\u00eb nj\u00eb korniz\u00eb akuzatore pa e zgjidhur plot\u00ebsisht tensionin nd\u00ebrmjet tyre apo pa vendosur mekanizma t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm mbrojt\u00ebs\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb raport.<\/p>\n<p>Ekspert\u00ebt kan\u00eb konstatuar se ka dilema t\u00eb konfirmuara q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb cenuar ky parim, si nj\u00eb prej parimeve m\u00eb t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme n\u00eb nj\u00eb proces gjyq\u00ebsor.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNuk mund t\u00eb nxirret ndonj\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim p\u00ebr shkelje t\u00eb barazis\u00eb s\u00eb arm\u00ebve vet\u00ebm mbi baz\u00ebn e k\u00ebsaj analize. Vler\u00ebsimi i drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb procedurave penale duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb gjith\u00ebp\u00ebrfshir\u00ebs dhe t\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb \u00e7do mas\u00eb korrigjuese apo element balancues t\u00eb zbatuar nga Paneli. Disa prej presioneve t\u00eb identifikuara mund t\u00eb rezultojn\u00eb t\u00eb jen\u00eb adresuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrshtatshme brenda vet\u00eb procedurave penale, nd\u00ebrsa t\u00eb tjera jo. P\u00ebr aq koh\u00eb sa rastet jan\u00eb ende n\u00eb proces, nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim p\u00ebrfundimtar nuk mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhet deri n\u00eb shpalljen e aktgjykimit dhe analizimin e arsyetimit t\u00eb tij. Megjithat\u00eb, kjo pjes\u00eb demonstron ekzistenc\u00ebn e kushteve strukturore q\u00eb mund t\u00eb ngrejn\u00eb shqet\u00ebsime lidhur me barazin\u00eb e arm\u00ebve, disa prej t\u00eb cilave jan\u00eb shfaqur n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb dokumentuar dhe konkrete. Kjo justifikon monitorim t\u00eb vazhduesh\u00ebm dhe sistematik\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb raport.<\/p>\n<p>Provat nga Serbia<\/p>\n<p>Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr problematik\u00eb e evidentuar duksh\u00ebm, jan\u00eb provat nga Serbia. Ekspert\u00ebt bazohen n\u00eb tri parime: i pari, Serbia ka qen\u00eb pal\u00eb n\u00eb luft\u00eb, pra pal\u00eb n\u00eb akuzat ndaj krer\u00ebve t\u00eb U\u00c7K-s\u00eb. E dyta, Serbia ka konfirmuar zyrtarisht se \u00ebsht\u00eb e interesuar q\u00eb ata t\u00eb d\u00ebnohen, dhe ka d\u00ebrguar prova, dhe e treta nd\u00ebrlidhet me besueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e provave.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSerbia nuk e njeh pavar\u00ebsin\u00eb e Kosov\u00ebs (sipas nenit 182 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs s\u00eb Serbis\u00eb, Kosova mbetet formalisht e p\u00ebrcaktuar si krahin\u00eb serbe) dhe vazhdon ta karakterizoj\u00eb U\u00c7K-n\u00eb si organizat\u00eb terroriste. Qendra p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejt\u00ebn Humanitare ka dokumentuar se politika zyrtare n\u00eb Serbi q\u00eb nga viti 2012 \u00ebsht\u00eb form\u00ebsuar nga nj\u00eb narrativ\u00eb e nd\u00ebrtuar mbi viktimizimin serb dhe heroizimin e forcave t\u00eb armatosura serbe, me p\u00ebrjashtimin sistematik t\u00eb krimeve t\u00eb kryera nga forcat serbe kund\u00ebr shqiptar\u00ebve t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs \u2013 nj\u00eb narrativ\u00eb e promovuar aktivisht p\u00ebrmes mediave t\u00eb kontrolluara nga shteti\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb raport.<\/p>\n<p>Sipas raportit t\u00eb BHCR, trajtimi ose p\u00ebrfshirja e shtetit serb n\u00eb mbledhjen e provave nuk mund t\u00eb supozohet si neutral.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNd\u00ebrsa nuk mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb nj\u00eb rregull kategorik q\u00eb aplikon standarde t\u00eb ndryshme pranueshm\u00ebrie sipas origjin\u00ebs komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb prov\u00ebs, interesat institucionale specifike dhe sjellja e dokumentuar e shtetit serb, t\u00eb identifikuara m\u00eb sip\u00ebr, jan\u00eb faktor\u00eb q\u00eb, kur jan\u00eb t\u00eb pranish\u00ebm, ndikojn\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt n\u00eb zbatimin e rregullave t\u00eb zakonshme q\u00eb rregullojn\u00eb autenticitetin dhe zinxhirin e ruajtjes s\u00eb prov\u00ebs\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Mekaniz\u00ebm p\u00ebr mbik\u00ebqyrjen e Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale<\/p>\n<p>Andaj, raporti thekson se viktimat presin drejt\u00ebsi, por q\u00eb vendimet e Speciales, mund t\u00eb ndikojn\u00eb edhe n\u00eb paqen dhe stabilitetin n\u00eb rajon.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKy vler\u00ebsim ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi p\u00ebr arsye q\u00eb shkojn\u00eb p\u00ebrtej aspektit procedural. N\u00eb loj\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb liria e individ\u00ebve. Viktimat kan\u00eb pritur me dekada p\u00ebr p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi, dhe komunitetet e prekura kan\u00eb interes t\u00eb madh n\u00eb drejt\u00ebsi q\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm t\u00eb jepet, por edhe t\u00eb shihet se jepet. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, vendimet dhe produktet e DHSK-s\u00eb do t\u00eb ndikojn\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pashmangshme p\u00ebrpjekjet m\u00eb t\u00eb gjera t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb tranzicionale dhe arkitektur\u00ebn ende t\u00eb brisht\u00eb t\u00eb paqes dhe stabilitetit n\u00eb rajon. Pasojat e gabimeve n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb fush\u00eb shtrihen p\u00ebrtej kufijve t\u00eb sall\u00ebs s\u00eb gjyqit\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb raport.<\/p>\n<p>Ekspert\u00ebt kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar krijimin e nj\u00eb mekanizmi mbik\u00ebqyr\u00ebs p\u00ebr Gjykat\u00ebn Speciale.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cP\u00ebr k\u00ebto arsye, BHRC rekomandon krijimin e nj\u00eb mekanizmi t\u00eb q\u00ebndruesh\u00ebm monitorimi t\u00eb gjykimeve, t\u00eb pavarur dhe t\u00eb pajisur me burime t\u00eb mjaftueshme. DHSK-ja \u00ebsht\u00eb themeluar p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar drejt\u00ebsi q\u00eb g\u00ebzon besim n\u00eb rajon dhe m\u00eb gjer\u00eb. Kjo k\u00ebrkon v\u00ebzhgim t\u00eb vazhduesh\u00ebm nga jasht\u00eb dhe gatishm\u00ebri t\u00eb vet\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs p\u00ebr ta pranuar nj\u00eb mbik\u00ebqyrje t\u00eb till\u00eb\u201d, p\u00ebrfundon raporti.<br \/>\nAvokati i Popullit ka b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb ditur se ky raport do t\u2019u dor\u00ebzohet misioneve diplomatike n\u00eb Kosov\u00eb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Komiteti i Od\u00ebs s\u00eb Avokat\u00ebve p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut i Anglis\u00eb dhe Uellsit, nj\u00eb&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":9024,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,4,2,32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bote","category-kosove","category-lajme","category-top-lajme"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9022"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9022\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9025,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9022\/revisions\/9025"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/9024"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faktiditor.ch\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}